Onscreen evaluation with script, rubric and reviewer decision together

For evaluators who need context at the moment of review.

This workflow is relevant to institutions that want to move answer-script evaluation out of paper bundles and into a consistent onscreen process without converting an educator's judgement into an automated decision.

An evaluator loses time when evidence is split across tools.

When a script, marking scheme, score sheet and comments live in different places, reviewing a single response becomes slower and harder to audit. PaperGrader brings the materials together at the question level and records the outcome of the review.

How the evaluation workflow operates

1. 01

   Open the source script

   An evaluator works from the scanned answer sheet rather than an isolated text extract.

2. 02

   Review question context

   The question, answer content and applicable rubric are presented for the assessment decision.

3. 03

   Inspect the draft

   AI-assisted score suggestions and feedback are available as review inputs, not final outcomes.

4. 04

   Edit or approve

   The authorised reviewer can revise the score and feedback before confirming the result.

5. 05

   Keep the decision traceable

   The approved state retains the reviewer and timing information required for later inspection.

Onscreen does not mean unattended.

The value of an onscreen workflow is not just digitisation; it is the ability to review evidence and make an accountable decision in one place. Institutions remain responsible for evaluator allocation, moderation policy and approval rights.

Operational benefits

• Reduces context switching during answer-script review
• Keeps the original script accessible to the evaluator
• Shows rubric-based AI suggestions as review inputs
• Supports score changes before approval
• Captures a clearer audit record for evaluation decisions

Continue the evaluation

• Digital evaluation system
• AI answer sheet evaluation software
• Accuracy methodology
• Responsible AI grading